论纳尔逊·古德曼对“准分析”困境的解决及其效应  

On Nelson Goodman's Solution to the Dilemma of "Quasi Analytic Method" and Its Effect

作　　者：姬志闯[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学哲学系、马克思主义与当代中国研究所,河南开封475004

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2012年第4期7-12,125,共6页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：笔者主持的国家社科基金项目“纳尔逊·古德曼哲学与当代美国哲学的话语转换”(09CZX026);河南省人文社科研究中心课题的阶段性成果

摘　　要：作为对肇始于弗雷格的经典分析(构造)计划的进一步推进和实现,卡尔纳普的那个以"准分析"为基本方法的构造系统历来被公认为楷模。然而,古德曼却发现,"准分析"面临着足以威胁其整个构造计划的"同伴关系"和"不完美的共有"困难,并基于多元主义、唯名论和个体计算方法给出了解决方案,不仅因重构了构造主义而回应了对整个构造主义计划的质疑,而且借助于实用主义因素的引入奠基了分析哲学两大学派的融流取向。As a further advancement and realization of the classical analytic plan started from Frege, Camap's construction which isbased on the basic approach of the 'Quasi Analytical Method' has always been taken as a model. But Goodman found that it is faced withthe companionship difficulty and the difficulty of imperfect community great enough to immediately threaten his whole construction plan.Based on pluralism, nominalism and merelogy, Goodman put forward a solution so that he not only responded the query toconstructionalism by the reconstruction of it, but also laid a foundation for the mixing of the two branches of analytic philosophy.

关 键 词：卡尔纳普 “准分析”困境 纳尔逊·古德曼 解决方案 效应 

分 类 号：B83-06[哲学宗教—美学]