检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王清云[1] 孙元元[1] 周生通[2] 白新理[1]
机构地区:[1]华北水利水电学院土木与交通学院,郑州450011 [2]上海交通大学机械系统与振动国家重点实验室,上海200240
出 处:《噪声与振动控制》2012年第4期25-30,45,共7页Noise and Vibration Control
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(基金编号:2007BAG02A04)
摘 要:基于势流体理论和Westergaard理论建立两种考虑水体作用的U型薄壁渡槽有限元模型。在两种模型的基础上做模态分析,得到了不同水深下的U形薄壁渡槽的振动特性。对比分析两种模型不同水深下的模态计算结果,得到了:(1)随水深增加,渡槽结构固有频率降低;(2)Westergaard模型计算结果低于势流模型;(3)水深对同一振型频率的影响程度在两种模型中也是不同。在结果对比分析的基础上,提出一种改进的Westergaard模型(iWestergaard模型),结果显示改进的Westergaard模型结果与势流结果吻合的很好。Two types of U-shape thin-wall aqueduct models with considering the action of fluid were established according to the potential-based fluid theory and Westergaard theory respectively. With these two models, modal analysis of the aqueduct was conducted, and the effects of water depth on the modal results were also analyzed. Comparing modal results of between these two models, it was found that: (1) the natural frequencies of aqueduct decrease with the increase of water depth; (2) the modal results of Westergaard model are lower than these of potential-based fluid model; moreover, (3) the effects of water depth on the natural frequencies corresponding to the same mode shapes are also different in these two models. On the basis of the comprehensive results comparisons and analysis, an improved Westergaard model (iWestergaard model) was proposed, results showed that the results of i Westergaard model are agree well with these of potential-based fluid model.
关 键 词:振动与波 U形薄壁渡槽 势流模型 Westergard模型 iWestergard模型 振动特性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222