论体育人类学研究范式中的跨文化比较  

Cross-cultural Comparative Studies on the Research Paradigm in Anthropology of Sport

作　　者：杨海晨[1,2] 王斌[1] 胡小明[3] 赵芳[4] 沈柳红[5] 陈宁[6] 李良桃[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学体育学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]桂林电子科技大学体育部,广西桂林541004 [3]华南师范大学体育科学学院,广东广州510631 [4]广西师范大学,广西桂林541004 [5]玉林师范学院体育系,广西玉林537000 [6]武汉纺织大学体育部,湖北武汉430200

出　　处：《体育科学》2012年第8期3-15,共13页China Sport Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(10ATY001);国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CTY022);国家社会科学基金青年项目(10CTY005)

摘　　要：采用文献资料调研与逻辑分析法,首先对体育人类学的跨文化比较的沿革进行了溯源。研究认为,体育人类学的发展史可以说就是一部体育人类学跨文化比较的演进史。它萌芽于对欧洲封建神权统治提出挑战的文艺复兴时代;形成及发展于殖民扩张中;在两次世界大战期间出现争鸣并达成一些共识;战后到全球化前期出现学科化与体制化趋势;进入全球化时代后,通过反思使跨文化比较趋于整合。就如何进行体育人类学跨文化比较研究进行了思考:提出应遵循可比性、整体性、主客位性等原则;在研究方法上应综合考虑类型比较法、历史比较法及模式比较法等方法;应选取具有相似表现形式的项目,根据地缘或渊源进行研究。提出跨文化的历史诉求应是为了促进对他者文化的理解。This paper, employing the method of literature review and logical analysis, traces the first step in the evolution of cross-cultural comparison of sport anthropology. The research suggests that the history of sport anthropology is essentially the evolution of cross-cultural comparative studies of sport anthropology. It bourgeoned in the Renaissance when the Europe- an began to question the theocracy, and developed during the colonial expansion. During the two world wars, different voices emerged, while some common grounds on the subject were reached. During the post-war period, upon the arrival of globalization, there emerged the trend to organize and institutionalize the varied thoughts into discipline. The research team, pondering every possible methodology in comparative studies, then proposed such principles as Compara- bility, Unity and Emic and Etic. In terms of methodology, it is agreed that the type compari- son, historic comparison and pattern comparison should be concerned at the same time. The re- Searchers are suggested to approach subjects that are in similar forms by studying their geo- graphic features or origin. The paper holds that the historical end of cross-cultural studies is to understand the other culture.

关 键 词：体育人类学 研究范式 跨文化比较 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]