机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学护理学院基础护理教研室,乌鲁木齐830000 [2]新疆医科大学护理学院教务室,乌鲁木齐830000 [3]新疆医科大学第一附属医院护理质量督导专家组,乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2012年第20期2436-2440,共5页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨新疆护理教师工作压力现状并分析其影响因素,为提出护理教师队伍建设的相关对策提供实证依据并为护理院校管理和教师人才队伍的可持续发展提出建议。方法采用高职教师工作压力量表对新疆15个地、市、州抽取的10所护理院校在编在岗的256位护理教师进行问卷调查,调查其工作压力现状并分析其影响因素。结果护理专职教师的工作压力得分为(2.436±0.576)分,大于2分,说明教师的工作压力大。教龄、婚姻、兼职情况及教学工作量不同的教师因社会因素而产生的工作压力水平不同,不同婚姻状况的教师因学校管理及制度因素产生的压力水平不同,性别、年龄、学历、婚姻、教学工作量不同的教师个人职业发展所带来的压力水平不同,性别、教龄、每周课时量等在护理院校教师工作压力不同;年龄、婚姻状况、教学工作量不同的教师因人际关系产生的工作压力水平不同,性别、年龄、教龄、职称、婚姻、教学工作量、收入水平及兼职情况不同的教师因工作负荷压力水平不同,性别、职称、婚姻、教学工作量、担任教学课程不同的教师因个人特质因素带来的工作压力不同,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论护理专职教师的工作压力大,来源是多方面的,学校管理制度和社会因素带来的压力最大,因此应尽快改变社会各界对护理教育认识上的不足和偏见,明确护理教育的定位,加大国家对护理教育的投入,同时护理教师应提高对自己职业的认识,合理制定自己的职业生涯发展规划。Objective To investigate into the current situation of nursing teachers' working pressure in Xinjiang and analyze the influence factors, in order to provide basis for countermeasure about teachers' team construction, and valuable suggestions for the sustainable development of nursing school management and talent team. Methods Measuring scale of teachers' working pressure and questionnaire were used to conduct a survey of 256 nursing teachers from 10 nursing schools in 15 regions in Xinjiang, and analyze the influence factors. Results The working pressure score of nursing teachers was (2. 436 ±0. 576 ) , which meant that they felt under heavy pressure. Teachers with different school age, marriage status, part-time job situation and workload bore different levels of working pressure due to social factors. Teachers with different marriage status bore different levels of working pressure due to school management and policies. Teachers with different gender, age, degree, marriage status and workload bore different levels of working pressure due to professional development. Teachers with different gender, school age, and workload bore different levels of working pressure. Teachers with different age, marriage status, and workload bore different levels of working pressure due to interpersonal relationship. Teachers with different gender, age, school age, professional title, marriage status, workload, income and part-time job situation bore different levels of working pressure. Teachers with different gender, professional title, marriage status, workload and curriculum bore different levels of working pressure due to different personal traits. And all the differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions The working pressure of professional nursing teachers is from different sources, in which school management and social factors bring the greatest pressure. Therefore it is necessary to change the prejudice toward nursing education, define the position of nursing education and increase
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...