权威之法与合法之法——拉兹与哈贝马斯法治观之比较  

The Law of Authority and the Law of Legality ——Comparison about the Views on Rule of Law between Raz and Habermas

作　　者：陆洲[1] 刘训智[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第4期603-609,共7页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目(09XFX001)

摘　　要：面对法治这一法哲学的核心概念,拉兹与哈贝马斯的研究路径各有千秋。拉兹以实践理性为法治的理性论基础,秉承传统分析实证主义的形式法治观,并引入法律权威概念来阐明合法性问题。哈贝马斯则以交往理性为理性论基础,在批判形式法治观基础上提出了程序主义法治观,认为只有经过特殊的民主立法程序,法律才具有合法性。About rule of law, the core concepts of jurisprudence, Raz and Habermas have given different answers. Raz adhered to the traditional concept of positivism in the formalism of the rule of law, and introduced the concept of legal authority to clarify the legality of the law, which was based on the practical reason. However Habermas criticized the formalism of rule of law and put forward the concept of procedural rule of law, which was based on communicative reason. Habermas insisted that only through a special democratic legislative process had law the legitimacy.

关 键 词：实践理性 交往理性 形式主义法治 程序主义法治 权威之法 合法之法 

分 类 号：D90-053[政治法律—法学理论] D908[政治法律—法学]