检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康鹏伟
机构地区:[1]濮阳市卫生监督局,河南475000
出 处:《医学动物防制》2012年第8期917-918,共2页Journal of Medical Pest Control
摘 要:目的了解濮阳市城区餐饮单位食(饮)具消毒现状,提出监督管理意见,进一步加强食(饮)具消毒管理工作。方法 2010年9~10月对162家餐饮单位1 294件餐(饮)具进行检测,按照《食(饮)具消毒卫生标准》(GB14934-1994)进行评价。结果不同类型的餐饮单位合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2=209.29,P<0.01);6类餐具中汤匙合格率较高(79.57%),筷子合格率较低(49.75%),不同食(饮)具合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2=54.61,P<0.01);消毒方法对食(饮)具合格率有影响,差异有统计学意义(χ2=245.86,P<0.01)。结论餐(饮)具消毒合格率总体较低,筷子、餐盘等大件餐具存在不消毒或消毒方式不正确等问题,建议进行综合监督管理。Objective To understand disinfection status of eating(drinking) utensils in catering units,propose supervisory management suggestion and furtherly strengthen disinfection management.Method From September to October,2020,1 294 eating(drinking) utensils of 162 catering units were detected and evaluated by Hygienic Standard for Disinfection of Dinner and Drinking Set(GB14934-1994).Results The qualified rates were significant differences between various types of catering units(χ2=209.29,P<0.01).Among the 6 kinds of tablewares,the qualified rate of tablespoon was the highest,which was 79.57%,and chopsticks was the lowest,which was 49.75%.There were significant differences between various types of eating(drinking) utensils(χ2=54.61,P<0.01).Sterilization method effected the qualified rate(χ2=245.86,P<0.01).Conclusions The overall qualified rate of eating(drinking) utensils was low.Chopsticks,plates and other large tablewares were not disinfected or disinfected incorrectly.We suggested to enhance comprehensive supervision and management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.206.125