检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱新林[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《法学论坛》2012年第5期142-149,共8页Legal Forum
基 金:2011年度国家社科基金青年项目"民事证据排除程序研究"(11CFX055)的阶段性成果
摘 要:当事人是民事诉讼证据收集的主角,对作为裁判对象的事实基础负责,有必要为当事人收集证据提供程序保障。法律传统、诉讼理念、律师代理情况与立法成本等是构建当事人证据收集制度路径选择中的考量因素。增加文书提出命令、重构庭前证据交换制度、通过切断当事人对书面证言之依赖进而强化证人出庭作证是提升当事人收集证据能力的基本出路,应该纳入到民事诉讼法修正案草案中。In civil evidence collection system, the parties is the leading role and responsible for providing evidence, the civil pro- cedure law should safeguard the parties' right to collect evidences especially when their burden of proof is strengthened. Facing with various suggestions, how to choose the specific evidence collection approach suitable for China? There are several consider- ing factors : legal tradition,litigation theory, the situation of lawyer agency and the legislative cost. In order to improve the par- ties' ability to collect evidence, we should establish the order of putting forward evidence to court, reconstruct the evidence - ex- change system and perfect the witness appearing in court system, through revising the Civil Procedure Law of PRC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222