检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阎光才[1]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学高等教育研究所,上海200062
出 处:《高等教育研究》2012年第7期38-45,共8页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(09JZD0036-1);上海市哲学社会科学规划教科重点课题(A0908);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-08-0201)
摘 要:调查表明,中美高校特别是研究型大学中教师的研究精力投入所占比重越来越大,甚至远远超过了本科教学。这种教师研究与教学存在明显失衡的现象,反映了高等教育系统及其组织内部存在的一种"学术棘轮"效应,它是政府的质量控制和资源配置体制、高校学术评价与晋升制度、学术共同体内部学术认可机制等多种因素共同作用的结果。缓解"学术棘轮"效应的现实路径,不能仅仅在声言上强化教师教学的伦理责任和使命感,而是需要正视它存在的客观性和必然性,并针对不同主体的需要建立起一个切实有效的利益均衡机制。According to some surveys, in Chinese and American higher education institu- tions, especially those research universities, faculty are spending increasingly more efforts on research, much greater than that on undergraduate teaching. This phenomenon reflects the "academic ratchet" existing both in higher education system and within institutions. It is the combined result of several factors, such as government's quality control and resources allo-cation patterns, universities' academic evaluation and promotion policies, as well as the aca-demic recognition mechanism within the academic community. Therefore, a realistic ap-proach to relieving the "academic ratchet" can not be limited to faculty being called upon to shoulder their ethical responsibility. Rather, it should be regarded as a reasonable and inevi- table fact in the current situation, and thereby, in view of various needs, a feasible and effec-tive interest-balanced mechanism is necessary to be established.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学] G644.4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222