检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《法学杂志》2012年第10期155-159,共5页Law Science Magazine
基 金:中国法学会2010年部级法学研究课题"惩治犯罪与刑事和解的平衡"(课题编号:CLS-C1021)的阶段性成果
摘 要:刑事和解作为一种独特的刑事纠纷解决机制,对保护涉案双方权益,促进加害人回归社会,修复受损关系,增进社会和谐具有极其重要的意义,修正后的《刑事诉讼法》分三个条文对刑事和解作出原则规定。要准确把握具有中国特色的刑事和解制度,就必须结合中国现实,反思其观念分歧,探寻刑事和解的中国化路径。刑事和解在我国适用过程中存在着观念分歧以及实践"困境",只有把握好刑事和解的适用范围、条件以及阶段,并加强监督,才能更好地服务于以人为本及社会和谐的价值目标。Abstract:Criminal reconciliation as a unique dispute resolution mechanism, which is of great signifi the protection of rights and interests of both parties, to promote the offenders return to society, to repair cance for damaged relations and promote social harmony is extremely important. And at this stage to build with Chinese characteristics, criminal settlement system must be combined with China's realities, the author reflects on their plight, ex- plores the Chinese way of criminal reconciliation. The author argues that, currently, we must have a good grasp of the scope of the criminal settlement, conditions & stage, and strengthen supervision in order to better serve the pur- pose of people - oriented values and goals of social harmony.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222