检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张松松[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210097 [2]金陵科技学院外国语学院,江苏南京210001
出 处:《外语研究》2012年第5期1-7,112,共7页Foreign Languages Research
基 金:江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目"句法和语义互动的隐喻和转喻视角"(项目编号:2012SJD740039);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目"句法和语义互动的隐喻和转喻视角"(项目编号:CXLX12_0374)的阶段性成果
摘 要:形态句法层面的隐喻和转喻研究为认知视角下的句法和语义互动研究注入了新的活力,语法意义隐喻和转喻视角转向拓宽了认知语法的视野。本文从介绍认知语法和生成语法对待句法和语义互动冲突的不同解决方案入手,回顾了语法意义的隐喻和转喻视角研究现状,认为语法隐喻和语法转喻并不是互动关系的两种单纯的唯一模式,隐喻和转喻互动的具体模式的确定是研究语法意义和隐喻/转喻互动关系的前提和难点。最后,本文尝试提出了语法意义和隐喻/转喻的互动模型以及隐喻和转喻的互动模型。但是,它们具体互动模式的确定还有待基于汉语语料的进一步研究。Studies on metaphor and metonymy at the morphosyntactical level reenergize the study of the interaction between syntax and semantics from a perspective of cognition,and the turn to metaphoric and metonymic perspectives broadens the horizon of cognitive grammars.Comparing the cognitive solution with the generative solution to the conflict between syntax and semantics,this paper reviews the present metaphoric and metonymic studies of grammatical meaning,by pointing out that grammatical metaphor and grammatical metonymy are not the simple and sole interaction patterns,and concrete interaction modes between metaphor and metonymy are prerequisite and difficulty.Then,the paper proposes two interaction models,one between grammatical meaning and metaphor/metonymy and the other between metaphor and metonymy.Their specific interaction modes,however,are yet to be defined through Chinese corpus-based research in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31