检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建中医药大学心理学教研室,福州350108 [2]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062
出 处:《心理研究》2012年第6期35-39,共5页Psychological Research
摘 要:儿童社会信息加工的情绪-认知整合模型指出,对各种反应的情绪后果预期会影响儿童对反应的提取、决策及对情绪活动的评价。本研究运用规范行为区分任务(原称为社会情境任务)测查不同攻击/受欺类型儿童的情感预期能力,结果发现:不同类型儿童在3个规范-违反行为判断子任务上得分及总分上均不存在显著性差异,但在对规范行为和对违反行为判断的差异上,未卷入儿童在各个情境中所判定的差异都更大;未卷入儿童在三个任务情境上的规范行为觉知能力都优于其他类型儿童,其规范行为觉知能力具有跨情境的一致性;三个任务情境都具有检测力,但不同任务情境具有不同的检测力或区分力。According to Integrated Model of Emotion Processes and Cognition in Social Information Pro- cessing(IEC-SIP), emotional outcome expectations of responses would influence response generation,evalua- tion, and decision. Study aims to find out the features of affective anticipation of children with different aggression/victim groups by using story tests, which originally called social situtations task, to explore children's ability to differentiate normative behavior from violation behavior. The results see that there isn't significant difference in each of normative-violation identifying tasks among different aggression/victim groups, so as to the total score, but difference between normative and violation behavior judged by non- involved children is significant and greater than any other kinds of children; non-involved children's ability to apperceive normative behavior is the best and has cross-situational consistency; all of the three social situtations tasks can test, but each has different degree of effectiveness.
分 类 号:B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.208