转轨批评家的荒谬逻辑  

ABSURD LOGIC OF THE TRANSITION CRITIC

作　　者：熊元义 王文革[2] 

机构地区：[1]<文艺报>社理论部,北京100083 [2]北方工业大学办公室,北京100041

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2012年第6期92-97,共6页Journal of Yunmeng

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学立项资助课题(11BA011)"新时期以来中国艺术家艺术观念谱系性研究"

摘　　要：吴亮在抨击那些批判当代资本主义社会的知识分子时不但袒露了自己的思想转轨即明确地承认他曾经信奉、现在已不再完全信奉马克思的逻辑和马克思的教诲,而且公开地为资本家的残酷剥削包括剥夺辩护,认为工人依赖资本家养活,而不是工人自己劳动养活自己。与那些世界观矛盾的知识分子相比,吴亮的这种思想转轨不但是中国当代一拨丧失历史感的知识分子社会背叛的产物,而且集中地反映了这类寄生在历史的碎片中的知识分子的特性,即他们在搁置马克思对资本的贪婪本性的道德批判的同时还反对工人争取美好生活的社会斗争。While Wu Liang attacked those intellectuals who criticized the modem capitalist social, he not only exposed his ideological transition （he clearly admitted that he won＇t believe in the whole Marx＇s logic and the instruction any more, which he had believe in before.）, but also defended capitalists＇ cruel exploits in public, including expropriation. In his view, workers live by capitalists, not by their hard work. Comparing to those intellectuals with contradictory world outlook, Wu liang＇s ideological transition is not only the results that the intellectuals with loss of history emotion, betrayed the society, but also reflected the features of this kind of intellectuals who lives in the fragrnent of history, which is that they ignored the moral criticism to capital greed nature by Marx, meanwhile, they opposed workers to fight for good living.

关 键 词：思想转轨 批判 立场 逻辑 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]