检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈浩[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院民商法学院,山东济南250014 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872
出 处:《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第4期10-15,共6页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目"程序利益论"(12Yj820123);中国法学会部级研究课题"民事诉讼与诉外调解对接机制研究"{CLS(2011)C38}
摘 要:完整回顾了诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制的发展经历,科学归纳了诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制的多元类型,客观分析了盲目试点非法定衔接机制、过量适用诉讼主动型衔接机制、过多设置强制型衔接机制、非强制型衔接机制分流案件效果亟待提高等诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制的现实缺陷,并在此基础上,重点提出了充分响应实践需求、科学总结研究成果、创新诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制的具体形式、继续提升诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制的立法品格等极具现实意义的诉讼与非诉讼衔接机制完善层面的具体路径。This paper reviews the history of the linkage mechanism of civil action and non-litigation procedures com- pletely, sums up the multiple types of the linkage mechanism scientifically, and moreover, objectively analyzes the defects in conducting tests at using non statutory linkage mechanisms, excessively applying the civil action active link- age mechanisms, massively designing the compulsory linkage mechanisms and the apparently lacking of shunt effect of non-compulsory linkage mechanisms. On the above basis, the paper provides several realistic measures to improve the linkage mechanism of civil action and non-litigation procedures as follows : fully responding the demand of practice, scientifically summarizing the results of studies, extending the types of the linkage mechanism and continuously rai- sing the legislative level of the linkage mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28