检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张静[1] 贾婧杰[1] 袁虎[1] 于飞[1] 刘穹[1] 陈雷[1] 王荣光[1] 王洪田[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科/解放军耳鼻喉研究所,北京100853
出 处:《解放军医学院学报》2013年第1期91-93,共3页Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School
基 金:军队"十一五"科技攻关课题(08G128)~~
摘 要:目的提高鼻内镜解剖训练的教学质量和效果。方法在鼻内镜解剖训练中应用互动式教学模式,用视觉模拟标尺评分法和鼻内镜解剖训练培训效果调查表进行教学效果评估。结果 5期157位学员均按要求用视觉模拟标尺评分法填写了鼻内镜解剖训练培训效果调查表。培训前,学员对上颌窦的解剖熟悉程度得分最高(5.82±0.43),海绵窦得分最低(3.01±0.48)。培训后,上颌窦的解剖熟练程度得分仍然最高(9.99±0.38),海绵窦得分仍然最低(4.32±0.42)。培训前后比较,学员在所有16个方面均有提高(P=0.000 1)。结论互动式教学模式有益于鼻内镜教学。Objective To improve the teaching level and efficacy of nasal endoscopic anatomy training. Methods Teaching efficacy of interactive teaching mode in nasal endoscopic anatomy training was assessed using the visual analogue scale and questionnaire of nasal endoscopic anatomy training. Results The questionnaire of nasal endoscopic anatomy training was filled in by 157 trainees according to the visual analogue scale scoring system. Their understanding of nasal anatomy was significantly better after training than before training(F=2 199.941 9 vs F=425.731 3,P=0.000 01). They had a best understanding of the maxillary sinus anatomy and a poorest understanding of the cavernous sinus both before and after training. Their understanding level in all the 16 aspects of nasal anatomy was significantly higher after training than before training(P=0.000 1). Conclusion Interactive teaching model can improve the teaching level in nasal endoscopic anatomy training.
分 类 号:R765[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3