检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:窦凯[1] 聂衍刚[1] 王玉洁[1] 刘毅[1] 黎建斌[1]
机构地区:[1]广州大学教育学院,广州510006
出 处:《心理科学》2013年第1期139-144,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目(BBA090067);广州大学广州人心理与行为研究中心的资助
摘 要:本研究的目的在于探讨青少年情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感之间的关系及情绪调节方式在其中的中介作用。采用《情绪调节自我效能感量表》、《情绪调节方式量表》、《青少年生活满意度量表》和《快乐感量表》对1128名中学生进行测查,结果表明:(1)情绪调节自我效能感与情绪调节方式、生活满意度、积极情感、消极情感关系紧密;(2)情绪调节自我效能感和情绪调节方式可显著预测主观幸福感;(3)减弱调节在情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感间起部分中介作用。Regulatory emotional self-efficacy is a widely concerned issue in recent years. It is defined as the individual's confidence level of successfully managing their emotion. Regulatory emotional self-efficacy helps mitigate emotional tension, maintains self - control effectively and improves ones ability of self-control towards emotional impulsiveness. As an essential social competency, regulatory emotional self-efficacy has been demonstrated to impose various effects on the processes of attention, memory and motive. Failure in managing one's emotion will easily result in affective dysfunctions and decrease one's subjective well-being. Previous research has found that there are large differences in the effect of emotional regulation, which not only result from the ability or skill in regulating one 's emotions, but also from the perceived self-efficacy. On the ground of the above reasoning, the current study hypothesized that: ( 1 ) regulatory emotional self-efficacy will directly influence subjective well-being; (2) people with different regulatory emotional self-efficacy may choose different styles of emotional regulation; ( 3 ) people using different emotional managing strategies will show different positive and negative expression, and further influence their subjective well-being. The Regulatory Emotion Self-Efficacy Scale (Revised) , the Regulatory Emotional Style Questionnaire, The Youth Life Satisfaction Scale and the Happiness Scale were administered to 1128 middle school students. The Pearson correlation, hierarchical regression and structural equation modeling statistical methods were adopted to analyze data. The results showed that : ( 1 ) regulatory emotion self-efficacy positively correlated with life satisfaction ; (2) the style of emotional regulation was associated with subjective well-being; (3) SEM analysis showed that the style of mitigating regulation served as the mediating variable between regulatory emotion self-efficacy and subjective well-being, and
关 键 词:情绪调节自我效能感 主观幸福感 情绪调节方式 青少年
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249