检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何冬丽[1]
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第2期280-281,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:河南省社科联;经团联2011年调研课题(SKL-2011-2258)
摘 要:目的探讨农村留守经历对大学生主观幸福感和成人依恋的影响。方法以248名有农村留守经历和488名无农村留守经历大学生为研究对象,采用横断面调查并进行总体幸福感量表和成人亲密关系体验问卷的施测。结果①有留守经历农村大学生在依恋风格类型分布上与无留守经历农村大学生比较差异显著(χ2=7.997,P<0.01);有留守经历组在依恋回避上得分显著高于无留守经历组(t=2.839,P<0.01),主观幸福感得分显著低于无留守经历组(t=-2.805,P<0.01);②农村留守经历大学生的依恋回避和依恋焦虑与主观幸福感存在显著负相关(r=-0.374,P<0.001;r=-0.137,P<0.05),主观幸福感在依恋类型上有显著差异(F=3.865,p<0.01)。结论留守经历对农村大学生依恋和总体幸福感有负面影响。Objective To explore the effect of left-behind experience on adult attachment and subjective well-being of rural college students.Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 248 rural college students with left-behind experience and 488 non-left-behind,consisting of three parts:Basis conditions,the General Well-being Questionnaires Experiences and Close Relationships Inventory.Results ① As for college students with left-behind experience,their attachment style distribution was different from that of others(χ2=7.997,P0.01),and their attachment avoidance(t=2.839,P0.01)was higher and their subjective well-being(t=-2.805,P0.01)was lower compared with other college students;②There exited correlation among adult attachment and subjective well-being(r=-0.374,P0.001;r=-0.137,P0.05);Attachment styles had significant differences in the subjective well-being of students with left-behind experience(F=3.865,P0.01).Conclusion Attachment style and subjective well-being of college students are influenced by left-behind experience.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15