也论元刊杂剧与李开先的收藏关系——甄炜旎《〈元刊杂剧三十种〉与李开先旧藏之关系》失误辨  

Li Kaixian's Collection and Play Scripts Published in Yuan Dynasty:Faults in Zhen Weini's "Li Kaixian's Old Collection and 30 Play Scripts Published in Yuan Dynasty"

作　　者：杜海军[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《艺术百家》2013年第1期159-163,共5页Hundred Schools In Arts

摘　　要：《元刊杂剧三十种》是仅存的元刊元人杂剧,对于人们认识元杂剧、推进元杂剧研究的深化有着特别的意义,于是其出处流传也为人们关注。长期以来,人们据孙楷第等人研究以为出自李开先旧藏,近年来甄炜旎博士论文别持一端,以为并不一定都出自李开先,这一说法有一定道理,但其将《词谑》与元刊杂剧比较,以及解读内容的错误,结论也就不能支持其论点,因此我们据现有的论据,还只能认定元刊杂剧属于李开先的旧藏,只是提醒人们还须继续关注元刊杂剧的出处问题。For a long time, according to researches made by Sun Kaidi et al. , 30 Play Scripts Published in Yuan Dy- nasty has been acknowledged to be collected by Li Kaixian. Zhen Weini stated in his doctoral thesis that the book does not necessarily belong to Li Kaixian＇s collection. It is reasonable to some extent. However, the conclusion is in- ferred from the comparison between Ci Xue and 30 Play Scripts Published in Yuan Dynasty. In addition, there are some faults in his understanding of the material. Therefore, according to available arguments, we just could define that play scripts published in Yuan dynasty belong to Li Kaixian＇s collection.

关 键 词：戏曲艺术 李开先 元刊杂剧 词谑 《元刊杂剧三十种》 

分 类 号：J80[艺术—戏剧戏曲]