检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学外国语言文化与国际交流学院,杭州310058 [2]浙江大学心理与行为科学系,杭州310027
出 处:《应用心理学》2012年第4期309-314,共6页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:国家社科基金(No.10CYY002);国家教育部人文社科项目(No.09YJC740065);浙江省社科项目(No.08CGWW006YBQ);浙江省钱江人才计划资助
摘 要:认知风格反映了个体在处理信息过程中所表现出的稳定倾向性:整体型个体和分析型个体分别倾向于整体地和解析地对信息加以加工,并导致行为模式上相应的差异。本研究采用句子分类任务,探讨认知风格对句子加工的影响。研究结果显示:在句子理解中,总体上被试倾向于以构式信息为句子分类的依据。同时,虽然认知风格不会对句子意义的理解产生显著影响,认知风格与动词或构式的交互作用显示,分析型被试相比整体型被试更倾向于依赖动词信息,而整体型被试则显著地依赖构式为分类依据。Cognitive style has been defined as an individual' s characteristic and consistent approach to organizing and processing information. As one of its important dimen- sions, the wholist-analytic (WA) dimension reflects the way in which an individual organizes information, either globally or in parts, that leads to differences in behav- ior. The present study adopted the sentence sorting task to explore the influence of cognitive style upon sentence meaning processing. The results showed that subjects sorted sentences significantly based on constructions. Moreover, the significant interaction between cognitive style and constructions suggested that cognitive style in- fluences the linguistic information subjects rely on in sentence comprehension. The wholists tend to compre- hend sentences based on constructions, whereas the analytics rely more on verbs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.201.27