检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南林业科技大学涉外学院,湖南长沙410004 [2]中南林业科技大学林业遥感信息工程研究中心,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《中南林业科技大学学报》2012年第10期158-161,共4页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
基 金:国家863课题研究任务"森林资源信息快速提取技术研究"(2012AA102001-4);国家林业局林业公益项目专题(201104028):林分结构与生长模拟技术研究
摘 要:基于遥感的森林信息提取的信息源比较多,这些信息源由于本身参数的差异,其有效提取结果并不相同。以湖南省株洲市攸县黄丰桥林场为研究对象,利用SPOT5多光谱数据、TM和CBERS02星多光谱数据,分别开展森林信息提取,并对结果进行比较;同时还开展了决策级融合比较。研究结论如下:SPOT5多光谱波段提取针叶林信息最好,精度达到了84.00%;利用TM提取阔叶林信息效果最好,精度达到了85.42%;决策级融合后各地类分类精度都有所提高,尤其灌木林分类精度达76.92%;决策级融合后总体精度达85.08%,Kappa系数达0.813 2,基本达到SPOT5数据2.5 m(87.29%,0.838 5)的分类准确度。Numerous remote sensing sources can be used on forest information extraction, among them there are lots of differences in parameters, so the extraction results are different greatly. The forest information of Huangfengqiao forest farm in Zhuzhou city, Hunan province has been extracted, analyzed and compared by using the remote sensing data such as SPOT5 multi-spectrum, TM and CBERS02 multi-spectrum. At the same time, the decision level data fusion was carried out, then the precision of four images were compared. The results show that the effects of SPOT5 multi-spectral band to extract coniferous forest information was the best, the precision reached 84.00%; after the decision level data fusion had been made, the classification precision of every land types improved, especially shrubbery' s went up to 76.92%, the overall accuracy of decision level fusion reached 85.08%, and the Kappa coefficient 0.8132, which basically reached the precision (87.29%) of SPOT5 with 2.5 meter resolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44