姚永朴史学方法再探析  

A restudy of Yao Yongpu's historical research method

作　　者：朱杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学历史系,安徽合肥230061

出　　处：《淮南师范学院学报》2013年第1期18-22,共5页Journal of Huainan Normal University

基　　金：安徽省社科规划项目"桐城派与安徽清代书院研究"(AHSK07-08D53)

摘　　要：姚永朴在民国初年参与编修清史,在北大教授史学课程,后其门人整理形成《史学研究法》一书。在新旧时代交替,政局变换,学制更新的社会背景之下,姚永朴史学实践与史学著作相结合,其在方法论上将刘知几的"史学三长"同姚鼐的"义理、文章、考据"相结合,在具体方法上,一方面继承中国传统史学考史、论史、重视史料的特点。另一方面在构建研究方法写作体系,部分结论的推导过程上也借鉴了归纳、比较和综合等逻辑思维方法。在编修清史上,对传统正史编写组织形式、体例变动、编修步骤这些问题也都有自己的认识与观点。在历史教科书的编纂上,在形式、内容和方法上也多有创新。Yao Yongpu compiled Qing History and taught the historiography in Peking University in the early years of the Republic of China, after that, the Historical Research Method was arranged by his disciples. Under the social background of era transition, political flux and educational update, through the analysis of Yao Yongpu＇s historical practice and books, in methodology, he combined Liu Zhiji＇s three key factors in historiography and Yaonai＇s Yi Li, writing and textual criticism. In concrete method, on the one side, he inherited some characters of traditional Chinese historiography, like textual research, history criticism and taking into account historical data. On the other side, he referenced some logical thinking methods,like induction, comparative method and synthesis in building his study methods, writing system and derivation process of some conclusions. For Qing History＇s compilation, he had his own views on traditional official history＇s writing organization, style change, compiling procedure and so on. He also had some innovations on forms, contents and methods in compilation of history textbook.

关 键 词：姚永朴 史学方法 归纳 比较 综合 编纂 

分 类 号：K09[历史地理—历史学]