三种白酒废水好氧处理工艺的对比  

Comparison of three technologies of aerobic treatments for liquor waste water

作　　者：于宏伟 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江省轻工设计院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《酿酒》2013年第2期58-60,共3页Liquor Making

摘　　要：比较了生物接触氧化法、SBR(或CASS)和曝气生物滤池(BIOFOR)这三种白酒废水好氧处理工艺的优缺点。相比而言,曝气生物滤池(BIOFOR)工艺是白酒废水处理的优选工艺,其具有一次性投资少,运行费用低,处理效果好,运行稳定、维护方便等优点,但BIOFOR工艺要求进水水质在700mg/L以下,因此,应与生物接触氧化法结合使用,采用生物接触氧化法+BIOFOR滤池工艺作为白酒废水的好氧处理工艺。The advantages and disadvantages of three aerobic treatments, biological contact process, SBR （or CASS） and biological aerated filter （BIOFOR）, for liquor waste water were compared. Comparatively, biological aerated filter （BIOFOR） was the best technology with little investment, low cost of operation, better effects, stable operation and convenient maintenance. However, in this process the quality of water input should be lower than 700mg/L. Therefore, BIOFOR combined with biological contact process was considered as aerobic technology for liquor waste water treatment.

关 键 词：白酒 废水 好氧处理 工艺 对比 

分 类 号：TS262.3[轻工技术与工程—发酵工程] X703.1[轻工技术与工程—食品科学与工程]