“善”与非自然性质——摩尔思想变迁考  

"Good" and Non-natural Property: Moore's Changes in his Thought

作　　者：杨松[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系

出　　处：《伦理学研究》2013年第2期54-58,141,共5页Studies in Ethics

基　　金：2012年教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"语言分析与规范判断"(项目编号:12YJC720048)

摘　　要：摩尔在《伦理学原理》中关于"善是非自然性质"这一观点的阐述并不令人信服,遭到了布劳德等人的批评。摩尔在与他人的讨论中,一方面承认自己的不足,另一方面吸收他人的合理见解,思想上产生了不小的变化。尽管摩尔并没有很好地解决自己的问题,但是就其对西方元伦理学的贡献和其"踏实求真"的学术态度而言,他仍然不失为一位伟大的思想家。Moore's point of view that good is a kind of non-natural property in 'EthicaPrincipia' was not persuasive and encountered the criticisms from Broad et al. Duringthe discussions with other scholars, he on the one hand acknowledged his insufficiencies,on the other hand absorbed other's reasonable opinions, which caused some changes onhis thoughts. Although Moore did not solve his problem very well, speaking of hiscontribution to Meta-ethics and his striving for steadfastly and really academic manner,he was still a great thinker.

关 键 词：善 非自然性质 摩尔 布劳德 思想变迁 

分 类 号：B82-0[哲学宗教—伦理学]