检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭文涛[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西第二医院护理部,成都610041
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2013年第12期70-72,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的调查本科护生对《儿科护理学》课堂授课的评价隋况,探讨改进刚L科护理学》课堂授课质量的对策。方法采用目的抽样对某大学护理系2010级10名本科护生进行访谈,并采用整群抽样对46名护生进行问卷调查。结果教师课堂授课评价总体得分(89.60±5.63)分,讲述内容充实、问题阐述重点突出、讲课娴熟、名词解释及专业外语运用得当等4项得分较高,启发式提问、讲课感染力及给予学生思考等项目评价较低。访谈结果提炼出3个主题:教学方法多采用传统讲授为主,应注意培养学生的能力;希望老师侧重讲解具有儿科特点的疾病及护理经验;在教学行为方面,教师授课特色不明显,课堂气氛较为沉闷。护生喜欢教师讲课有激情、内容充实、重点突出、启发思维。结论护生对《儿科护理学》课堂授课总体评价较为满意,但教师应进一步优化教学内容、创新教学方法、提升教学行为有效性。Objective To describe classroom teaching quality and to develop strategy for improving teaching quality of undergraduate pediatric nursing. Methods A total of forty-six junior students drawn from a nursing college were selected as subjects for cross-sectional study. The Teacher's Lecture Practice Evaluation Form developed by Sichuan University was used to measure teaching quality. A semi-structural interview was applied to obtain information from ten nursing students. Results The overall assessment of nursing teacher's classroom lecture was (89.60+5.63) points. Items of "enrichment of contents", "empha- sized points", "proficient in contents", "explanation of terms and application of professional English" got high score, items of "heuristic question", "lecture appeal", "enlighten students" obtained low scores. The interview results identified problems in teaching content, teaching method, and teaching behavior. Students provided suggestions for classroom teaching. Conclusions The classroom lecture performance of pediatric nursing is satisfactory, but teaching content, teaching method, and effective teaching behavior need to be upgraded.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R47-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3