我国特色的劳动争议仲裁终局化之理念和制度架构——《劳动争议调解仲裁法》第47条释正  

The Chinese Concept regarding Labor Dispute Mediation and Its Institutional Design:the Re-analysis and Interpretation of Art.47 of Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law

作　　者：涂永前[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100876

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2013年第3期66-74,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC820043);2012年度国家社科基金青年项目(12CFX088)

摘　　要：《劳动争议调解仲裁法》第47条规定了一种有条件、有限制的终局裁决制度,它不仅引起了必要的条文上的规范分析,也带来了学术上的仲裁终局化畅想。从第47条出发来认识我国劳动争议仲裁的终局化,要认识该条文在实施中的制度性和技术性问题,要兼顾劳动仲裁制度的一般法理,更要把握住我国劳动争议仲裁终局化中给予劳动者倾斜性保护以及提升劳动争议解决效率的务实理念。在学理上,强拉硬拽的或裁或审、一裁终局观念只会弱化仲裁的作用,不符合我们强调调解、仲裁的国情。继续强调第47条背后仲裁和审判的平衡观念,有利于明晰独具我国特色的劳动争议仲裁终局化之理念和制度架构。It is a common sense that in procedural law that both parties may choose arbitration or trial,and that the arbitral awards is final,which is also an academic voice of labor dispute arbitration system reform over the years.It provides for a conditional limit final ruling system in Article 47 of the Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law of PRC,which has not only caused the normative analysis,but also brought the imagination that the arbitration should be final.In order to recognize the finality of China＇s labor dispute arbitration from Article 47,we not only need to reconsider the technical issues in the implementation of the saying article,but also need to take into account the general legal principles of labor arbitration system,and especially to grasp the pragmatic concept to protect workers and improve the efficiency of labor dispute settlement.Therefore,Article 47 does not mean the return to civil arbitration,but the protection for workers through the balance of arbitration and trial,which demonstrates the Chinese characteristics of Article 47.

关 键 词：劳动争议仲裁 终局裁决 裁审关系 劳动者本位 

分 类 号：DF479.1[政治法律—民商法学]