赫拉克利特的隐匿诱惑——黑格尔、海德格尔与尼采的解释  

Heraclitus's Hidden Enchantment——Hegel,Heidegger and Nietzsche's Interpretation

作　　者：马成昌[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学哲学系,北京100048 [2]黑龙江科技大学人文社会科学学院,哈尔滨150027

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期76-81,共6页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：作为赫拉克利特哲学的主导词语,逻各斯、游戏与活火三个概念被后世哲学家作了多种解释。黑格尔把理解的重心放在逻各斯所表现出的辩证法要素上,而海德格尔将其诠释为"显现"与"聚集";海德格尔从游戏概念中生发出了他后期的"天地神人"四方游戏的思想,而尼采则由此孕育出了他的永恒轮回学说;黑格尔将活火理解为对立统一的"过程",海德格尔将其解释为既明又暗的"澄明",尼采将其理解为永不停息的"生成"。赫拉克利特哲学的原初性为后世哲学带来更加多元的解释维度。As the key words in the philosophy of Heraclitus, logos, playing and ever - living fire have attracted much critical attention from later philosophers. Hegel places emphasis on dialectics embodied in logos, while Heidegger derives the ideas of ＂ appearing＂ and ＂ assembling＂ from it. From Heraclitus＂ conception of playing, Heidegger generates a four - dimensional structure of playing, consisting of ＂ Sky, Earth, God and Human＂, and in contrast, Nietzsche bases his idea of eternal return upon Heraclitus＂ conception of playing. Hegel considers ever - living fire as a process of unifying opposites, while Heidegger interprets it as a flicker- ing. Unlike them, Nietzsche explicates it as an ever - happening. To conclude, the originality of Heraclitus philosophy provides later philosophers multiple dimensions for interpretation.

关 键 词：逻各斯 游戏 活火 赫拉克利特 

分 类 号：B506[哲学宗教—外国哲学]