耳鼻喉科考试试卷分析  

Analysis of examination paper of otolaryngology

作　　者：朱江[1] 何龙霞[1] 冉燃[1] 周倩[1] 胡国华[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院耳鼻喉科,400016

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2013年第5期520-523,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

摘　　要：目的评估重庆医科大学第一临床学院2007级学生耳鼻喉科学考试试卷的质量。方法以第一临床学院2007级学生耳鼻喉科学考试202份试卷为研究资料。将每名学生的总成绩和每题的答对情况等数据，利用SASS15．0软件包进行统计分析，计算每道考题的得分均数、标准差、难度系数及区分度，并对成绩分布进行正态性检验。结果考试成绩呈负偏态分布，平均分80．9，标准差10．9分；最低分56．5，最高分98．0；难度系数0．781，区分度0．308。结论本试卷题型全面，区分度良好，较客观反映了学生对本学科课程的掌握程度，但是也存在学生成绩分布不尽合理、试题难度偏易等问题，反映出在教学过程中还存在一些薄弱环节。Objective To evaluate the quality of examination papers of otolaryngology among students of grade 2007 in the first clinical college of Chongqing Medical University. Methods Totally 202 copies of examination papers of otolaryngology from grade 2007 students in our college were taken as research references. SASS 15.0 software was used to statistically analyze total score of every student and score of each question. Mean score, standard deviation, difficulty coefficient and discrimination coefficient of each question were counted and normality test was conducted. Results Scores were in negative skewness distribution, with mean score of 80.9, standard deviation of 10.9, the lowest score of 56.5, the highest score of 98.0, difficulty coefficient of 0. 781, and discrimination coefficient of 0. 308. Conclusions Examination papers are well designed and discriminated and can objectively re- flect students＇ command of the course. However, distribution of sores is unreasonable and examination paper is relatively easy to complete, indicating the weakness in the teaching process.

关 键 词：试卷 难度 区分度 

分 类 号：R-762[医药卫生]