检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵文成[1]
机构地区:[1]中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,武汉430063
出 处:《路基工程》2013年第3期114-116,121,共4页Subgrade Engineering
基 金:铁道部科技研究开发计划:高速铁路双线隧道缓冲结构深化研究(2010G018-C-2-1)
摘 要:在高速铁路建设中,隧道出口微压波控制是要考虑的重要课题之一。结合京沪高铁的西渴马二号隧道,对隧道洞口缓冲结构的设置参数进行了数值分析,评价了削竹结构和顶部开口结构在单一设置和组合设置情况下,对缓解微压波的效果。分析结果表明:开口式缓冲结构效果更好;组合缓冲结构的优化参数不可照搬单一设置时的优化参数。同时,通过分析,也证明了计算工况所采用的缓冲结构参数是科学合理的。In the course of high-speed railway building, controlling micro-pressure wave around tunnel exit is one of the problems that should be considered seriously. This paper, combining with the project of Xikema Tunnel 2 on Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway, carried out numeral simulation in relation to parameter settings of buffer structure of the tunnel portal, and then assessed the effect of bamboo-truncating portal, top- opening hood and their combination on relief efficiency of micro-pressure wave respectively. The results show that as regards the relief efficiency, top-opening structure is better, and the optimized parameters of the combined buffer structure shall not simply copy those of the single structure; at the same time, through analysis, the results also indicate that the parameters of the buffer structure used in these cases are scientific and reasonable.
分 类 号:U451.3[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7