检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方劲[1]
出 处:《外国经济与管理》2013年第6期2-12,共11页Foreign Economics & Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目<社会工作在农村反贫困中的应用研究>(批准号:11CSH077);浙江师范大学2012年博士基金科研项目
摘 要:如同"发展"是一个在理论和政治上富有争议的概念一样,"发展研究"亦是一个充满学术争论的研究领域,"发展研究"的发展史堪称一部"学术争论史"。因此,厘清相关的学术争论,显然是准确把握当代国外发展研究现状与发展趋势的基本前提。本文主要对发展研究的本质特征、学科属性、学术伦理、研究范式、学术前景等五方面的学术争论进行了系统分析,并从内因和外因两方面探讨了争论的可能动因,最后基于争论中可进一步探讨的学术空间,有针对性地对未来研究进行了展望。As development is theoretically and politically a controversial concept, development studies are a controversial research fielck In essence, the history of development studies is a history of academic debates. Therefore, the clarification of related academic debates is obviously the critical premise of the accurate grasp of current status and future trend of contemporary foreign development studies. This paper makes a system- atic analysis of academic debates about development studies in five aspects, namely essential character- istics, subject property, academic ethics, research paradigm and academic prospect, and discusses the possible motive for the debates from the internal and external perspectives. At the same time, it point- ediy raises the directions in future research in view of the academic space worthy of further discussion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222