联盟契约对知识整合的影响研究——基于公平感知的分析  

The Effects of Contracts on Knowledge Integration: The Role of Perceived Justices of Alliance

作　　者：高展军[1] 王龙伟[2] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学经济管理学院,西安710063 [2]西安交通大学管理学院,西安710049

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2013年第7期95-103,共9页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"合作研发治理机制的动态变化对企业创新绩效的影响研究"(71002088);陕西省软科学基金项目"陕西省‘军民融合’高新技术企业创新网络发展研究"(2010KRM60)

摘　　要：基于契约治理、联盟公平及制度理论,提出了联盟显性契约与规范契约影响分配公平与程序公平的权变观点,并考察联盟公平对知识整合的影响。研究认为,显性契约与分配公平正相关,与程序公平负相关;规范契约与分配公平和程序公平均正相关。制度环境对这些关系会产生调节效应:法规实施无效率负向调节显性契约与分配公平、程序公平之间的关系,但正向调节规范契约与分配公平、程序公平之间的关系;政府支持正向调节显性契约与分配公平、程序公平之间的关系,但负向调节规范契约与分配公平、程序公平之间的关系。相比于分配公平,程序公平对知识整合会产生更强的影响。Drawing on contract governance, alliance justice and institutional theories, this study offers a contingent view of the effects of explicit contracts and normative contracts on perceived distributive justice and procedural justice, and explores the relative influences of perceived justices on knowledge integration. The study suggests that licit contracts have a positive effect on distributive justice and negative effect on procedural justice respective- and normative contracts have positive effect both on distributive justice and procedural justice. Further more, these effects depend on institutional environments. Legal enforcement inefficiency negatively moderates the rela- tionships between explicit contracts and distributive justice or procedural justice, but positively moderates the rela- tionships between normative contracts and distributive justice or procedural justice. Whereas government support positively moderates the relationships between explicit contracts and distributive justice or procedural justice, but negatively moderates the relationships between normative contracts and distributive justice or procedural justice. Fi- nally, we propose that perceived procedural justice has a stronger positive effect on knowledge integration than per- ceived distributive justice

关 键 词：显性契约 规范契约 分配公平 程序公平 制度环境 知识整合 

分 类 号：F406.14[经济管理—产业经济]