现代性的话语限度与文学史的人文回归  

Modernity Discourse Limit and Literature Humanistic Regression

作　　者：裴萱[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《兰州学刊》2013年第2期60-69,共10页

摘　　要：现代性话语理论成为现代文学史研究的一种尺度,也给文学史起到学科建构、系统梳理等积极作用。但现代性自身的异质性、模糊性和单一性面对更为复杂多样的文学史进程显出理论的僵化和文学自身话语的失落;另一方面,现代性自身与文学性、人文性和审美现代性之间的张力关系也使文学史的价值取向产生游移。在新的时代语境中,坚持历史价值的"谱系性"原则、美学的体验原则和对人文、人性的关注成为文学史基本的价值立场,同时也能够促使文学史在学科互涉、文化研究、消解意义的后现代保持审美立场和人文回归。依托"无定法的历史规约"、"独到的审美体验"和"丰富的情感"等原则,人文性质的文学史书写得以可能。The discourse of modernity theory has become a principle which got into the modem literature history research, it also gave the literature history positive function of discipline construction, system carding and so on. But modernity has its own shortcomings of heterogeneity, fuzziness aald unity which making itself defeated and rigidify in face of complicated literary history; On the other hand, the tension among the modernity itself and literariness, humane and aesthetic modernity also make the vacillate value of literature value. In the new era context, adhere to the historical value of the ＂ pedigree sex＂ principle, aesthetic principle and experience to the humanities, has become basic values of literature. In the same time,it they will also promote liter- ature history keep aesthetic standpoint and humanistic regression in the subject of postmodern comprehensive subjects, cultural studies, dissolves mean- ing. Relying on the ＂ uncontrolled history specification＂ ,＂ the original aesthetic experience＂ and ＂emotion＂ principle, the humanity of literature history writing will become possible, i~

关 键 词：现代性 文学史 启蒙 历史谱系学 人文性 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]