检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李银笙[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,南京210093
出 处:《淮阴工学院学报》2013年第4期26-30,共5页Journal of Huaiyin Institute of Technology
摘 要:传统"升堂"模式的庭审和现代"开庭"模式的庭审,都无法解决局外人(审判者)与局内人(当事人)之间深层次对话、交往的问题。主体间(jiān)性理论,认为人与人可以完成相互理解和认识;但主体"间(jiàn)"性的存在,表明每个人都是异质的,人与人之间不能完全相互理解和认识。主体"间(jiàn)"性犹如附体魅影,参与着正义之迷的生成,主体"间(jiàn)"性的克服,需要深化司法民主。Neither the traditional mode of holding court trial and the modern mode of holding a court is able to solve the problem of further dialogue and contact between outsiders(judges) and insiders(parties).The inter-subjectivity theory holds that mutual understanding and communication can exist between individual persons,but because of the existence of subjectivity gap between parties which indicates that each individual is different,individual persons can know and understand each other completely.Inter-subjectivity is like phantom which is involved in the generation of just events.It is necessary to deepen judicial democracy in order to overcome the subjectivity gap.
关 键 词:主体间性 主体“间(jiàn)”性 庭审 司法正义
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229