检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]杭州师范大学法学院,浙江杭州301136
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2013年第5期151-158,共8页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目(09BFX085)
摘 要:新《刑事诉讼法》增加的捕后羁押必要性审查制度,是人权保障理念在刑事诉讼领域的落实和展开,是对权力制衡理论和比例原则的顺应,将有助于防止超期羁押和随意羁押。但新《刑事诉讼法》对捕后羁押必要性审查机制的规定过于原则,需要从审查主体、程序的启动、运行以及救济等方面进行细化。为了使捕后羁押必要性审查机制有效运作,需要采取一些配套措施,如加强侦查取证能力以切断对羁押的依赖,加强部门合作拓展必要性判断的信息来源,探索羁押必要性判断方法的客观量化和判断主体的专业化等。The new criminal procedural law added the system of the review of the necessity of post - arrestment custo- dy. It is implementation and expansion to the idea of human fights protection in the field of criminal lawsuit, is to conform to the theory of the balance of power and the principle of proportion. It will contribute to preventing extended custody and arbi- trary custody. However, the provisions on the system in new criminal procedural law are very simple and need to be detailed in procedures such as review subject, the procedures~ start, operation and relief, etc. In order to make the system operate more effectively, we need to take some supporting measures, for example to strengthen the abilities for investigating and col- lecting evidences to cut off the dependence on custody, to strengthen departments'cooperation to expand sources of informa- tion on the necessity judgment, to explore objective and quantitative methods on necessity judgment and specialization of re- view subject.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28