论捕后羁押必要性审查——以新《刑事诉讼法》第93条为出发点  被引量:22

Necessary Review of Post-Arrestment Custody

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:姚莉[1] 邵劭[2] 

机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]杭州师范大学法学院,浙江杭州301136

出  处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2013年第5期151-158,共8页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基  金:国家社科基金项目(09BFX085)

摘  要:新《刑事诉讼法》增加的捕后羁押必要性审查制度,是人权保障理念在刑事诉讼领域的落实和展开,是对权力制衡理论和比例原则的顺应,将有助于防止超期羁押和随意羁押。但新《刑事诉讼法》对捕后羁押必要性审查机制的规定过于原则,需要从审查主体、程序的启动、运行以及救济等方面进行细化。为了使捕后羁押必要性审查机制有效运作,需要采取一些配套措施,如加强侦查取证能力以切断对羁押的依赖,加强部门合作拓展必要性判断的信息来源,探索羁押必要性判断方法的客观量化和判断主体的专业化等。The new criminal procedural law added the system of the review of the necessity of post - arrestment custo- dy. It is implementation and expansion to the idea of human fights protection in the field of criminal lawsuit, is to conform to the theory of the balance of power and the principle of proportion. It will contribute to preventing extended custody and arbi- trary custody. However, the provisions on the system in new criminal procedural law are very simple and need to be detailed in procedures such as review subject, the procedures~ start, operation and relief, etc. In order to make the system operate more effectively, we need to take some supporting measures, for example to strengthen the abilities for investigating and col- lecting evidences to cut off the dependence on custody, to strengthen departments'cooperation to expand sources of informa- tion on the necessity judgment, to explore objective and quantitative methods on necessity judgment and specialization of re- view subject.

关 键 词:人权保障 权力制衡 比例原则 程序细化 保障措施 

分 类 号:DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象