检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵文婧[1]
机构地区:[1]青海广播电视大学开放教育学院,青海西宁810008
出 处:《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第4期50-53,共4页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:完善的回避制度有利于实现刑事诉讼的实体公正和程序公正,有利于提高刑事诉讼效率,树立司法权威,提高刑事执法人员的素质。目前我国刑事诉讼中的回避制度未能真正发挥应有的作用,一方面,立法上对于回避制度的规定十分粗糙和原则化,没有可操作性;另一方面,实践中,大多数人对回避制度持漠然的态度。这对刑事司法正义的实现是非常不利的,而修正后的刑事诉讼法对于回避制度核心条款并无变动。鉴于此,笔者对回避对象范围、回避请求权人、回避理由、回避责任追究四个方面的些许思考进行阐述。Another funtion of the challenge system is to ensure the justice of criminal procedure and verdict, to improvement of criminal lawsuit efficiency, to set up the authority of the judiciary, to impro-ving the quality of law enforcement officials. It's a pity that to the current challenge system in criminal lawsuit is not truly play its rightful role, on the one hand, legislation for challenge system, the rough to the provisions and principles, no operability, on the other hand,in practice, most indifferent attitude to- wards challenge system. This is very negative for realization of criminal justice. In view of this, the author at the time of amending the criminal lawsuit, challenge object scope, shy away from people the right to re-quest, challenge responsibility, There are some think and described.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.228.88