《管子》与《淮南子》农业生态观之比较  

A Comparison of Agricultural Ecological View Between Guanzi and Huainanzi

作　　者：高旭[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学楚淮文化研究所,安徽淮南232001 [2]南开大学历史学院,天津300071

出　　处：《华南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期139-146,共8页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目(2011sk142);安徽省社科联项目(B2012001)

摘　　要：《管子》与《淮南子》都蕴含丰富的农业生态思想,而且二者之间具有内在的历史联系。强调农业生产的政治性,坚持"农本"理念,是《管子》与《淮南子》农业生态观的理论前提;在此基础上,二者论农都凸显出天人关系的特殊性,主张天、地、人相和谐的生态发展;二者都反对人类对自然生态的过度干扰和影响,深刻反思人类农业活动的现实的局限性。与《淮南子》相较,《管子》农业观在生态意蕴上缺乏更为浓厚的黄老道家气息,且其农本立场受到"重商"思想的一定影响,但《管子》所主张天、地、人相和谐的"三度"农业生态观对前者影响深远,成为其农业生态思想得以承继与融会的重要资源。Guanzi and Huainanzi involve rich agricultural ecological thought, and there is an intrinsic historical link between them. Both emphasize on the political nature of agricultural production and adhere to the agriculture-oriented concept; On this basis, the agricultural theory highlights the harmonious relationship of human and nature. With reflections on the limitations of the human agricultural activities, both are against excessive interference and impact on the natural ecology. Compared with Huainanzi, there is less ecological influence of Taoism and more influence of business in Guanzi, However, the ecological concept of harmony between human and nature has far-reaching influence on the former, as that is its important resources of inheriting and integration of agriculture ecological thought.

关 键 词：《管子》 《淮南子》 农业观 生态 天人和谐 黄老道家 

分 类 号：B226.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B234.4