检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟泉[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会学系
出 处:《中国人力资源开发》2013年第19期105-110,共6页Human Resources Development of China
基 金:国家社科基金重大课题"和谐劳动关系构建中的政府规制研究"(12&ZD095)
摘 要:美国劳动关系平衡理论不仅继承了美国多元主义理论的传统,又提出了依靠"权利平衡"实现"利益平衡"的理论逻辑。然而,大量劳动关系的实践证明,劳动关系主体之间的权力关系与不同主体所持参考系(frameofreference)的不同对该理论解释力提出了理论挑战。基于对该理论贡献及缺陷的分析,本文以中国劳资冲突为例,认为需要融合"主体逻辑平衡"概念从而增强平衡理论在中国情境下的解释力。The advent of theory of balance in the US is very significant at both theoretical and practical level. Not only does it inherit the pluralist tradition of industrial relations in America, but also it generates a new viewpoint in analysis, namely, achieving balancing interests relying on balancing rights in advance. However, many practical evidences indicate that power relationship between different actors and their various frames of reference pose challenges against the balancing theory. By discussing the theoretical contributions and shortcomings of the theory, the paper attempts to argue that strengthening applicability of theory of balance should be incorporated with the concept of 'actor logic balance' on the basis of some empirical evidences regarding industrial conflict in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.132.103