检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学护理学院,江苏南京210029 [2]淮阴卫生高等职业技术学校,江苏淮安223300
出 处:《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第5期450-453,共4页Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)
基 金:江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目<大学生择业自我效能感及提升策略研究>(09SJB880045)
摘 要:目的:探讨团体辅导对护生职业决策自我效能的影响。方法:将48名高职院校护理专业三年级学生随机分为实验组与对照组。对实验组进行为期8周的团体辅导干预。团体辅导前及结束后一周采用大学生职业决策自我效能量表(CDMSES)和应付方式问卷(CSQ)进行施测。结果:团体辅导后,实验组CDMSES得分、成熟型应付方式得分明显高于辅导前,且显著高于对照组(P均<0.05);不成熟型应付方式得分低于辅导前,且明显低于对照组(P均<0.01)。结论:团体辅导干预可有效提高护生职业决策自我效能水平,增强其面对困难时的应付能力。Objective:To evaluate the effect of group counseling intervention on career decision-making self- efficacy of nursing students. Methods:48 junior nursing students in vocational colleges were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. Experimental group were received 8 weeks group counseling. Two groups of students were investigated with the career decision making self-efficacy scale (CDMSES)and coping style questionnaire (CSQ)before and after group counseling. Results:After the group counseling,the CDMSES score and mature coping style score in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P 〈 0.05); immature coping style score was significantly lower than that of control group (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion:Group counseling intervention can effectively improve nursing students' career decision-making self-efficacy, and enhance their ability to cope with difficulties.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222