不同创造性思维水平者认知抑制能力比较研究  

Comparison Research on the Ability of Cognitive Inhibition of Individuals with Different Levels of Creative Thinking

作　　者：姚海娟[1] 陈乃溦[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学法学院心理学系,天津300134 [2]暨南大学管理学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《内蒙古师范大学学报（自然科学汉文版）》2013年第5期613-617,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC190028);天津市教育科学十二五规划课题(CE3011);天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJJX12-013)

摘　　要：采用《威廉斯创造力思考活动》测量了205人,从中筛选高创造性思维水平和低创造性思维水平的被试各15人,运用Hick任务和Navon任务,探讨创造性思维与认知抑制的关系.结果发现:(1)高创造性思维水平者在不包含干扰的Hick任务上的反应时显著短于低创造性思维水平者;(2)高创造性思维水平者在包含干扰的Navon任务的不一致条件下的反应时显著长于低创造性思维水平者,并且在局部加工时,高创造性思维水平者在一致条件下的反应时显著短于低创造性思维水平者,高创造性思维水平者在不一致条件下的反应时显著长于低创造性思维水平者.这表明高创造性思维水平者会根据不同任务灵活调整自己的注意水平,表现出灵活的认知抑制能力.研究结果支持Martindale(2007)提出的创造力的注意中介模型.205 undergraduates were recruited to complete Williams Creativity Scale,and then 15 people with high scores and 15 people with low scores were selected to complete Hick task and Navon task in order to investigate the relationship between creativity and cognitive inhibition. The results showed that： （1） There was no significant difference between creative people and non creative people; （2） In Navon task, The reaction time of creative people was significantly longer than those of non creative people under inconsistent condition~ In the local processing,the reaction time of creative people was significantly shorter than those of non creative people under consistent condition, while the reaction time of creative people was significantly longer than those of non creative people under inconsistent condition. Creative people could adjust their attention flexibly when they confronted with different tasks, and they exhibited a flexible cognitive inhibition ability. The Attention Intermediary Model of Creativity proposed by Martindale （2007） was supported by our research.

关 键 词：创造性思维 认知抑制 离焦注意 集中注意 

分 类 号：B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]