检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工业工程》2013年第5期39-44,共6页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:广东省自然科学基金资助项目(9452902001003568);广东省江门市哲学社会科学项目(2011C32)
摘 要:基于供应链金融,结合多任务委托代理模型,研究了制造商对供应商的线性激励。比较分析了不同信息状况下,各影响因素对激励强度、制造商期望收益的影响;讨论了不同信息条件下,供应链金融应收账款融资业务正常运行应达到的最优努力水平。研究发现:当信息对称时,通过设计合理的线性激励合同,制造商可以使供应商实现最优努力水平。当信息不对称时,制造商的期望收益与供应商的努力投入影响程度存在正相关关系,与供应商的成本系数、风险规避度存在负相关关系;且激励份额与供应商的风险规避度存在负相关关系。Based on supply chain finance (SCF), the linear incentive between supplier and retailer is studied from the perspective of multi-task principal-agency theory. Effects of different parameters on the stimulation intensity and the expected income of the manufacturer are analyzed in different information cir- cumstances. Also, the optimal level of effort at which the receivable business of SCF can run normally un- der different information conditions is discussed. It is found that, with symmetric information, by reasona- ble linear incentive scheme, the manufacturer is able to enable the supplier to reach the optimal level of ef- fort. With asymmetric information, the expected income of manufacturer is proportional to the influence of supplier efforts to it. At the same time, the expected income of manufacturer also has a negative correlation with supplier cost coefficient and risk aversion. In addition, there is a negative correlation with the incen- tive share and supplier risk aversion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117