英语写作分项评分和整体评分比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Analytic and Holistic Rating Scales for English Writing

作　　者：孙海洋[1] 韩宝成[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学外语系,北京100049 [2]北京外国语大学外国语言研究所,北京100089

出　　处：《解放军外国语学院学报》2013年第6期48-54,125,共7页Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages

基　　金：中国科学院大学2011年院长基金B项目"英语测试评分标准和评分方法的现代测量学研究"(Y15102MN00);中国外语教育基金项目"研究生英语测试评分标准和评分方法的现代测量学研究"(ZGWYJYJJ2012A26)

摘　　要：写作评分方法通常分为分项式和整体式两种。本研究采用这两种方法分别评阅非英语专业研究生撰写的文章概要和命题作文,并对其信度、评分结果之间的关系以及分项评分维度的效度进行了对比研究。结果显示,分项评分信度更高;评分员在评判整体分时更关注内容;分项评分维度的内容和结构重合过多,需合并。研究结果对大规模外语测试写作评分方法的选择和改进具有重要参考价值。Rating scales are classified into holistic and analytic approaches according to scoring methods. By analyzing the summaries and essays written by L1 Chinese non-English major graduates,this study investigates the reliability of analytic rating dimensions,their relations to holistic scores,and the validity of each rating dimension. It was found that the analytic scale resulted in higher reliability,raters relied more on content for holistic scoring,and content and organization dimensions highly overlapped and need to be combined. These findings have implications for writing assessment at large scale.

关 键 词：写作任务 分项评分 整体评分 信度 评分维度 

分 类 号：H310.4[语言文字—英语]