压抑与遮盖在视感知疗法治疗学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视中的疗效比较研究  

Comparison of the effect between penalization and occlusion in the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia

作　　者：孔旻[1] 林泉[1] 赵武校[1] 刘伟民[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院视光中心,南宁530021

出　　处：《中国临床新医学》2013年第11期1036-1038,共3页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE

基　　金：广西自然科学基金资助项目(编号:2010GXNSFB013082);广西卫生厅科研课题(编号:Z2011523)

摘　　要：目的比较研究视感知疗法在学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视中使用压抑与遮盖法的疗效。方法将78例(155眼)学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视患者,分别行压抑(43例,85眼)和遮盖(35例,70眼)法矫正视力较好眼,使用视感知疗法治疗1年后应用统计学分析疗效。结果压抑法的疗效优于遮盖法(P<0.05),总有效率也高于遮盖法(P<0.05),在轻、中度弱视患者中,压抑法的疗效均优于遮盖法(P<0.05),而在重度患者中,两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在采用视感知疗法治疗学龄儿童屈光参差性弱视患者中,压抑法矫正视力的效果比遮盖法要好。Obej ctive To compare the effect between penalization and occlusion in the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia .Methods In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia ,85 eyes of 43 patients received the penalization （ penalization group） and 70 eyes of 35 patients received the occlusion（occlusion group）.After 1 year researching was analyzed. Results The effects of the penalization group were better than the occlusion′s,the effects in both slight and moderate amblyopia of the penalization group also better than occlusion′s,their difference had the statistical significance （ P〈0.05 ） ,but in the severe amblyopia ,the difference of the effect between two groups had no statistical significance （ P〉0.05 ） .Conclusion In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia ,u-sing the penalization may have higher total effect than using the occlusion .

关 键 词：压抑 遮盖 屈光参差性弱视 视知觉学习 

分 类 号：R77[医药卫生—眼科]