检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学,天津300100
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2013年第5期48-53,共6页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
摘 要:近年来,随着高校作为行政诉讼被告的案件数量的攀升,高校作为行政诉讼的被告似乎在很大程度上得到了司法实务界的认可,然而,无论是田永案开启先列,抑或是甘露等案再度确认,学校在行政诉讼中的被告资格在理论界和实践中依然未达成一致的共识。通过分析最高法院公报的系列案件,以确认高校作为行政诉讼被告的合理来源与现实情形。同时,结合国外的系列先进经验并对之加以引进,以实现我国司法统一的最终目的。In recent years, with the rising number of universities as the defendant of administrative litigation, universities as the defendant in judicial practice appears to have been recognized. However, whether Tian Yong case opened the first column, or other cases reconfirmed, the dispute in theory or practice have been still existed. Through a series of case analysis of the Supreme People's Court Bulletin, in order to confirm the reasonable source of universities as the defendant of administrative litigation and the reality of the situation. At the same time, combined with foreign advanced experience and introduce it, in order to achieve the ultimate goal of unity of justice in china.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229