不同数字格式下SNARC效应的实验研究  

Experimental Study of SNARC Effect in Different Numerical Formats

作　　者：全小山[1] 师文慧[1] 柴洁余[1] 何飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]安顺学院教育管理系,贵州安顺561000

出　　处：《保健医学研究与实践》2013年第4期25-26,29,共3页Health Medicine Research and Practice

摘　　要：目的考察在不同数字格式下是否会产生空间数字反应编码联合效应（SNARC效应），探讨SNARC效应是否具有广泛性。方法采用2×2×2×4的4因素实验设计，通过0～9的骰子和听力数字的奇偶判断，分别进行测试研究。结果错误率数据占全部数据的2．76％。反应手主效应显著（F=7．66，声〈0．01）；数字大小主效应显著（F=6．68，p〈0．01）；反应手与数字大小交互作用显著（F=9．58，p〈0．01）；奇偶性主效应显著（F=5．78，p〈0．01）；奇偶性和数字大小交互作用显著（F=10．78，p〈0．01）；刺激材料、数字大小和奇偶性的交互作用显著（F=35．56，p〈0．01）；其余主效应不显著。在骰子点和听力数字刺激条件下，数字大小与反应手的交互作用显著。结论在骰子点和听力数字条件下都会产生SNARC效应，证明SNARC效应具有广泛性。Objective To explore whether spatial numerical association of response codes effect （SNARC effect） exists in different numerical formats and to explore whether the SNARC effect has universality or not. Method A test research was conducted using the experimental design of four factors 2×2×2×4 and through the dice 0-9 and judging odd number or even number of the hearing number respectively. Results Data with an error rate accounted for 2.76% of all data. Main effect of response hand was significant （F=7.66, p〈0.01） ; that of numerical magnitude was significant （F= 6.68, p〈0.01） ; interaction effect between response hand and nu-merical magnitude was significant （F=9.58, p〈0.01）; the main effect of parity was significant （F=5.78, p〈0. 01）; interaction effect between parity and numerical magnitude was significant （F=10. 78, p〈0. 01）; interaction effects in stimulus, numerical magnitude and parity were significant （F= 35.56, p〈0.01） ; other main effects were insignificant. Interaction effect between numerical magnitude and response hand was signifi-cant under conditions of dice dot and hearing number stimulus. Conclusion SNARC effect will occur under conditions of dice dot and hearing number, so it proves that the SNARC effect has universality.

关 键 词：数字加工 SNARC效应 

分 类 号：B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学]