雅斯贝尔斯《什么是教育》的学术影响研究——以CSSCI(1998-2011)的文献计量为基础  

Academic Influence of Karl Jaspers'Was ist Erziehung-Ein Lesebuch in China:A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index(CSSCI)Data(1998-2011)

作　　者：任增元[1] 安泽会 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学高等教育研究所

出　　处：《现代大学教育》2013年第6期46-53,112,共8页Modern University Education

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金项目"高等学校个人教育产权研究",项目编号:09YJA880019;吉林大学基本科研业务费项目"完善现代大学制度的深层问题研究--去行政化的视角",项目编号:2012BS036;国家社科基金项目"大学行政权力运行现状与优化对策研究",项目编号:13CZZ046

摘　　要：经过对CSSCI数据库收录的713篇相关论文的研究发现,雅斯贝尔斯的《什么是教育》作为一部经典名著在我国产生的影响很不均衡,一是少数章节获得高被引频次,而多数章节则备受冷落;在南方传播较为充分。统计发现学界最认同的核心观点是:真正的教育应该是灵魂的教育,而非理智知识的堆集;最为有效的教育方式是苏格拉底式的"对话教育";教育不是制器,教育计划应该保持一定界限,以尊重"教育即生成"的自然规律;大学、教师和学生应该享有学术自由,学术自由必须体现在大学师生每个具体的人身上;最好的研究者才能是最优良的教师。This paper is a systematic analysis of the academic influence of Karl Jaspers' Was ist Erziehung? Ein Lesebuch in China, based on Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index( CSSCI) Data( 1998- 2011). Through an analysis of 713 papers included by CSSCI database,it is found that Karl Jaspers' masterpiece has rather imbalanced influence in China,with a few chapters receiving fairly high citation rate,but most others almost totally ignored. Besides,the book is more popular and influential in Southern China. Statistics show that the following opinions put forward by Jaspers are very well-received by Chinese academics:( 1) true education should be the architecture of the soul rather than merely acquisition of intellectual knowledge;( 2) the most effective teaching method is the Socratic Dialogue Approach;( 3) education is not just a pre-designed program to train students for certain specific jobs,but a generative process by its nature;( 4) both teachers and students in colleges or universities should enjoy academic freedom;( 5) best teachers often turn out to be top researchers.

关 键 词：雅斯贝尔斯 《什么是教育》 对话教育 教育的本质 教育即生成 

分 类 号：G40-06[文化科学—教育学原理]