亚里士多德“功能善”对“目的善”的辩护及范导  

The Defense and Regulation of Aristotle's “the Function Good” to“the Ends Good”

作　　者：赵静波[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《科学．经济．社会》2013年第4期37-41,共5页Science Economy Society

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"美德的实在性研究"(12XZX017);教育部马克思主义理论研究建设工程重点教材<西方伦理思想史>(09JZDMG029)

摘　　要：亚里士多德对善的阐述是从目的性和功能性两条路径来展开的。在目的性论证中,他将善界定为人们所欲求的目的,如果仅从欲望这一角度来理解善,一般的善和具体境遇下对我而言的"善"就会存在分裂的可能。在功能性论证中,他将善的本质表述为合乎德性的现实活动,用德性限定了欲望的合理性,使对我而言的主观准则上升为绝对的客观法则。通过德性中道,人们维护了合理的欲望,并免于成为他人的手段而保证了自己的目的性;也促使个人在追求自我幸福的同时尊重他人的合理欲望。在这种情况下,德性与善也就有了内在的关联,"目的善"与"功能善"也就达到了完全契合。Aristotle describes the good by two aspects ends and functionality.In the demonstration of ends,he defined good as the purpose that people desire to achieve; however,it may cause the possibility of splitting between the＂general good＂ and the＂good in specific circumstances＂if we look at it only from the aspect of desire.In the functionality argument,Aristotle described good as the practical activities in line with the virtue by which the rationality of desire was defined,and for me,this is the turning point where a subjective criterion rose to the objective rule.By virtue moderation,people maintained a reasonable desire,and protected their own purpose instead of becoming the others＇ means.Natural disposition; accordingly,also contributed to the well-being of individuals in the pursuit of self happiness while respecting the legitimate desires of others.In this case,virtue and good has established their intrinsic connection where the ＂ purposive good＂ and ＂ functional good＂ also reached a fully fit.

关 键 词：德性 善 欲求 幸福 中道 

分 类 号：F403[经济管理—产业经济]