信访逻辑的法治悖论  

Logical Paradox of Calls & Letters in the view of Rule of Law

作　　者：孟庆涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学应用法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第11期23-27,共5页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：重庆市教委人文社科项目(12SKE05)

摘　　要：信访制度在设计和定位上,具有政治、权利保障与社会管理以及监督的功能。从法治的角度看,信访存在制度性不信任、增大社会治理成本、降低解决问题能效,并最终消解法治的负面效应。信访制度建构实质上受制于中国的文化心理机制,一定程度上导致民粹主义的倾向,放纵民众的欲望。在社会共同体中,公民的自由和权利不是流于欲望的放纵,而是意味着自律、社会责任与公民义务。因此,好的制度必须提供公民欲望的抑制机制,培养有德性的公民。Logical Paradox of Calls ＆ Letters in the view of Rule of Law MENG Qingtao （School of Applied Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China） Abstract ： The design and ori- entation of the institution for calls ＆ Letters is to perform the function of political and right protection, and social management and supervision. In the view of rule of law, there are negative effects of the calls ＆ letters institution, such as the mistrust of the institution, the increase of social management cost, reduction of efficacy of problem solu- tion, and elimination of the power of law. The construction of call - and - letter institution is subjected to the psy- chological mechanism of Chinese culture, which somehow leads to populism and lets the populace indulge in their desires. Civil liberties and rights should not be treated as that indulgence, but should mean discipline, social re- sponsibility and civic obligations. A good system must provide repression mechanism of desire for citizens and culti- vate their morality.

关 键 词：信访 功能 法治文化 民粹主义 公民德性 义务 

分 类 号：D632.8[政治法律—政治学]