东方美术的比较学研究  

Comparative Research on Oriental Fine Arts

作　　者：Dietrich Seckel 赫云[2] 

机构地区：[1]海德堡大学 [2]东南大学艺术学院,南京210029

出　　处：《文化艺术研究》2013年第4期134-140,共7页Studies in Culture and Art

基　　金：2009年度国家社会科学基金艺术学项目"比较艺术学体系研究"(09BA011)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：比较学使用历史的方法尤其是美术史的方法,其必要性是不言而喻的。这里的比较学是以比较的各种关系为对象、为认识的构成内容,即把这些关系主题化、问题化,而不是以根据固有特性和发生关系来正确把握历史现象为目的的方法的、技术的问题。这样就加深了对比较学本质诸特征和构造诸特征的理解,并使包括个别现象的原理得以被认识。因此,"比较"就自然而然地并非只是探索类似性、异质性,即意味着不仅要探索类比,也要探索差异或进行对比。比较学使研究回到造型艺术、文学、音乐等不同艺术的共同性和比较的可能性,即东方诸艺术之间关系的相互阐释。Comparative research adopts historical methods, art history in particular, and the necessity of it is self- evident. Instead of tackling methodological and technical questions based on inherent charac- teristics and relationships in order to understand historical phenomena correctly, it takes various kinds of relationships in comparison as objects, topicalizing and problematizing them in other words. Thus, the knowledge about the nature and structure of comparison is intensified, principles that cover individual phenomena understood. Naturally, cgmparison is not only about exploring similarities and hetero- geneities; it also means to investigate differences or contrasts. Comparison helps research return to the communality of various art types such as formative arts, literature and music as well as their possibility of comparison, or in other words, the mutual explanation of relationships between oriental arts.

关 键 词：东方美术 比较学 坐标系 

分 类 号：J0[艺术—艺术理论]