中日隐逸文学的异同——以吉田兼好与嵇康和陶渊明的比较为中心  

The Similarities and Differences between Chinese and Japanese Reclusive Literature Based on the Comparison between Yoshida Kenko and Ji Kang and Tao Yuanming

作　　者：张晓希[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津外国语大学比较文学研究所,天津300204

出　　处：《天津外国语大学学报》2014年第1期70-74,共5页Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"中国文学作品在海外的传播及影响"(09BWW003)

摘　　要：隐逸文学作为一种独特的文学形态和思潮在中日两国文学史上均占有重要地位。由于日本古代文学是在中国古代文学与文化的影响下产生和发展起来的,中日两国的隐逸文学之间也存在着千丝万缕的联系。而日本也有自己的独特历史与文化,隐逸文学又深深地打上其本土文化的烙印。试图通过日本中世隐逸文学的代表作家吉田兼好与中国魏晋时代著名隐逸文学家嵇康和陶渊明的比较,探讨中日隐逸文学的异同。Reclusive literature, as a special literary form and trend, plays an important role in both Chinese and Japanese literature history. The origin and development of ancient Japanese literature are influenced by ancient Chinese culture and literature, thus Chinese and Japanese reclusive literatures are deeply connected, Japanese reclusive literature bears a mark of the indigenous culture of Japan. This paper tries to compare the representative writer Yoshida Kenkoin the middle age of Japan （1192 A.D.-1602 A.D.） with the well-known Chinese reclusive writers Ji Kang and Tao Yuanming in the Wei and Jin Dynasties to explore the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese reclusive literature.

关 键 词：中日隐逸文学 隐逸思想 老庄思想 吉田兼好 嵇康 陶渊明 

分 类 号：I106-03[文学—世界文学]