检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙立会[1]
出 处:《课程.教材.教法》2014年第3期32-37,共6页Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基 金:教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"基于交互式电子白板多元互动课堂的教学策略重构"的阶段性成果(13YJA880040)
摘 要:关于电子教科书的争论从未停止过,是与非的简单价值判断比较容易做到。但最为重要的是客观、冷静和科学地认识电子教科书,而不是在把纸质教科书作为简单数字化的刻板印象的前提下进行讨论。应该从电子教科书构成的基本要素,即硬件、软件、内容、网络和使用者的角度去理解其便利与限度,从而更好地为学习者提供一种优质的电子教科书服务。但也要清楚,过分追求学习工具的便利性,而忽视其教育性,也不是一件好事情。Debating on the electronic textbooks has never really stopped. It is very easy to make simple value judgments. But what is more important is the thorough understanding of electronic textbooks objectively, calmly and scientifically, rather than just treating electronic textbooks as the digital form of traditional print textbooks. Only when we try our best to understand the convenience and limits of electronic textbooks from the aspects of basic elements such as hardware, software, content, network and users, could we provide quality services based on electronic textbooks. At the same time, we should clearly know that it is also not a good thing to pursue electronic textbooks'convenience excessively and neglect the instructiveness.
分 类 号:G423.3[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222