中文版护生核心能力量表的信效度检验  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the competency inventory for nursing students

作　　者：廖瑞雪[1] 刘彦慧[1] 王媛婕[1] 高佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津天津中医药大学护理学院,300193

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2014年第2期172-174,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

基　　金：天津市教育科学“十二五”规划课题（HE4031）,天津中医药大学大学生创新基金

摘　　要：目的 评价中文版护生核心能力量表（CINS）信、效度.方法 采用经Brislin法翻译并修订的中文版CINS,对266名护理本科生进行调查,运用SPSS17.0进行统计分析.结果 中文版CINS总量表的Cronbachs＇α系数为0.966,各维度Cronbachs＇α系数为0.827～0.951,Guttman分半信度为0.828,各维度Guttman分半系数为0.724～0.942,重测信度为0.737,内容效度为0.956,量表各维度间的相关系数为0.491～0.781（P＜0.01）,各维度与总量表之间的相关系数值为0.738～ 0.884（P＜0.01）.探索性因子分析抽取5个因子,累计解释的总方差为66.404％.结论 中文版CINS具有较高的信、效度,可用于护生核心能力的评估.Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the competency inventory for nursing students（CINS）.Methods The competency inventory for nursing students was translated and revised in Chinese version.Totally,266 baccalaureate nursing students were tested by the Chinese version CINS.SPSS17.0 was used to test the reliability and validity.Results The Cronbach＇ s α of CINS was 0.966 and Cronbach＇ sα of each dimensionality was ranged from 0.827 to 0.951.The Split-half reliability of Guttman of CINS was 0.828 and Split-half reliability of Guttman of each dimensionality was ranged from 0.724 to 0.942.The test-retest reliability was 0.737 and the content validity was 0.956.The correlation coefficients among dimensionalities were ranged from 0.491 to 0.781 （P＜0.01）.The correlation coefficients between dimensionalities and the total scale were ranged from 0.738 to 0.884（P＜0.01）.Five factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,accounting for 66.404％ of the total variance in the scale.Conclusion Chinese version of CINS is reliable and valid,and can be used to assess the competency of nursing students.

关 键 词：护生 核心能力 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]