检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张天杰[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2014年第2期47-52,共6页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
基 金:博士后科学基金一等资助项目(2013M540330);教育部人文社科青年项目(13YJC720050)
摘 要:在晚明高攀龙与刘宗周并称大儒,二人之间有着十多年的交游。高攀龙也是刘宗周最为重要的友人,前者在人格与学术两方面深刻影响了后者。但是,二人的思想却是同中有异,其中主要关涉到朱王之辨与儒释之辨两大问题。具体讨论高、刘二人的交游经历与思想异同,可以更好地梳理东林与蕺山两大学派的关系,从而深化学术史的研究。In the late Ming dynasty, Gao Panlong and Liu Zongzhou were known as great Confucianists. They were good company for over a decade. Gao Panlong, who exerted a deep influence on the personality and academic theory of Liu Zongzhou, was also the most important friend of Liu’s. Despite the similarities, their thoughts had differences, as are shown in their views of Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming and their views of Confucianism and Buddhism. This article is a discussion of the association and the similarities and differences of the thoughts of the two masters, in an attempt to clarify the relationship of the Donglin School and the Jishan School.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7